Big table of numbers from the same report

This is the top of Table I on page 22 of the same report (subsonic flow, air). We did the first 13 rows here.

A lot of the small exponents in the q/pt column are barely legible in the scan, so we checked them against the formula the table was built from. Every other number was checked the same way.

The scan

Scan of the top of Table I. The same numbers are in the table below.

What we made

Table I, subsonic flow, γ = 7/5 (first 13 rows)
Mp/ptρ/ρtT/Ttβq/ptA/A*V/a*
01.00001.00001.00001.00000∞0
.01.99991.00001.00001.0000.7000 × 10-457.8738.01095
.02.9997.9998.9999.9998.2799 × 10-328.9421.02191
.03.9994.9996.9998.9995.6296 × 10-319.3005.03286
.04.9989.9992.9997.9992.1119 × 10-214.4815.04381
.05.9983.9988.9995.9987.1747 × 10-211.5914.05476
.06.9975.9982.9993.9982.2514 × 10-29.6659.06570
.07.9966.9976.9990.9975.3418 × 10-28.2915.07664
.08.9955.9968.9987.9968.4460 × 10-27.2616.08758
.09.9944.9960.9984.9959.5638 × 10-26.4613.09851
.10.9930.9950.9980.9950.6951 × 10-25.8218.10944
.11.9916.9940.9976.9939.8399 × 10-25.2992.12035
.12.9900.9928.9971.9928.9979 × 10-24.8643.13126

89 out of 89 numbers match the formulas. The original prints small numbers like .7000 with a tiny −4 next to it; we wrote those out as × 10−4 so a screen reader says them properly.

Back to examples